Current Releases
Press Releases
Third Heathrow runway risks being a white elephant, says ippr
11 January 2009
The government should not commit to a third runway at Heathrow unless the industry's own emissions targets are guaranteed for any aircraft that want to use the new runway says the Institute of Public Policy Research (ippr).
Ahead of next week’s anticipated Government decision on whether to give the go ahead to a third runway at Heathrow, ippr says the building of a third runway should not go ahead unless the Government requires aircraft using the runway to meet the aviation industry's own targets to cut carbon dioxide emissions and noise in new aircraft by 50% and nitrogen oxides by 80% by 2020.
Simon Retallack, Head of Climate Change at the Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr), said:
“The economic advantages of building a third runway at Heathrow have been greatly overstated and the environmental case against it is overwhelming. If ministers were to give the runway a green light, this should only be with strict conditions for meeting tough air quality, noise and climate change targets.
"The aviation industry has pledged to cut carbon dioxide emissions and noise in new aircraft by 50% and nitrogen oxides by 80% by 2020. Only aircraft which meet or exceed those targets should be permitted to land on any new runway. BAA and the airline industry must bear the risk that a third runway will be a white elephant if aviation cannot be made greener.
“If a third runway is built without these conditions attached, European air quality standards will continue to be breached, noise pollution for households on flight paths will increase and a valuable opportunity will be missed to ensure the aviation industry prepares for a low carbon future.”
Notes to editors
Through ACARE (the Advisory Council for Aerospace Research in Europe), the aviation industry is committed to achieving three goals for new aircraft technology by 2020, compared to a benchmark for large civil aircraft from 2000:
1) Reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 50 per cent per passenger kilometre.
2) Reducing nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions by 80 per cent.
3) Reducing perceived aircraft noise by 50 per cent.
These targets are mostly expected to come through improvements to engines and airframes. The targets were set voluntarily by the European aviation industry and are broadly in line with USA research goals set by NASA.
Contact
Kelly O’Sullivan, Media Officer on k.osullivan@ippr.org / 020 7470 6125 / 07753 719 289
follow us on twitter:
ippr in the news:
The English question seen from Westminster
Devolution Matters - February 3
The English Question
BBC Radio Scotland - February 2
Make climate change politics matter
Financial Times - February 2
Chances of Copenhagen climate talks 'rematch' unlikely, say experts
The Guardian - February 1
Tory MPs tell David Cameron: Cut Scotland's subsidy
Telegraph - February 1
Government 'tick box' approach to ethnicity drives whites towards BNP, IPPR report says
The Telegraph - January 28
Don't leave equalities stranded
politics.co.uk - January 28
Prison reform consensus builds but ministers fail to take heed
Public Finance - 20 January
48% of black youth in UK don’t have jobs: IPPR
New Statesman - January 20
Analysis: National security's Tory tint
politics.co.uk - 15 January
Capable Communities
Public Service Reform: The next chapter
In this paper we turn our attention to the role citizens and communities can play in directly producing services, setting out the challenges that lie ahead, and identifying the questions our research will seek to answer over the coming months.
The English Question
ippr surveys MPs
ippr has conducted a survey of MPs to find out if they think that England is losing out as a result of these changes, as many people have claimed.
You Can’t Put Me In A Box
Super-diversity and the end of identity politics in Britain
This paper attempts to map out just how diverse Britain is, both in terms of who lives in Britain and how they identify themselves.